People always like to be picky, but no matter what, LED lighting is always much better than incandescent lamps. Why should the government explicitly eliminate incandescent lamps in the end? With compulsion, it is not too perfect. After all, LED lighting fixtures have not yet reached the ideal position in the hearts of the people. So, there is never a shortage of products in the LED lighting market, what is lacking is products that meet demand.

At present, many companies still expect the "disappearance" of incandescent lights to bring LED lighting an opportunity to "take off". In fact, the LED lighting industry has never lacked similar opportunities. The previous ten city ten thousand lamps, the later ten city ten thousand lamps phase II, a series of government projects, and recent hot government subsidies. Furthermore, even if incandescent lamps are eliminated, there are still fluorescent lamps that are rampant in the market.

However, the withdrawal of incandescent lamps from the market can indeed free up some market space. However, it is worth noting that the LED bulb lamps on the market are obviously not awesome. The current application of incandescent lamps may not be suitable for LED bulb lamps, such as kitchens, dusty rural areas, etc.

As wise consumers, ordinary people will never struggle with their wallets just because they are challenging a certain industry. How to make consumers willingly pick up their wallets without being deceived is currently an urgent consideration for the entire LED industry. After all, there is a lot of room for the development of LED lighting, including market, research and development, price, and so on.